General
Mandel Engel, Doing Business under the Name of Chase Handkerchief Co., Respondent, v. Kerchiefs, Inc., et al., Appellants
278 A.D. 784·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1951·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(April 23, 1951.)
Mandel Engel, Doing Business under the Name of Chase Handkerchief Co., Respondent, v. Kerchiefs, Inc., et al., Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
In an action to recover compensation based on a percentage of sales made by defendants, the appeal is from an order denying their motion for judgment on the pleadings dismissing the complaint for insufficiency. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and Mac-Crate, JJ., concur.