Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
First National Bank of Richmond, Virginia, et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. William R. Trigg Company et al., 1910 — 218 U.S. 693 · caselaw · US
General
First National Bank of Richmond, Virginia, et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. William R. Trigg Company et al.
218 U.S. 693·Supreme Court of the United States·1910
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 82.
First National Bank of Richmond, Virginia, et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. William R. Trigg Company et al.
In error to the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of Virginia.
June 17, 1910.
Mr. George Bryan and Mr. A. W. Patterson for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. E. Randolph Williams and Mr. R. G. Bickford for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY]
Dismissed pursuant to the twenty-eighth rule.