Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In re Yamashita. Yamashita v. Styer, Commanding General, 1945 — 326 U.S. 694 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
In re Yamashita. Yamashita v. Styer, Commanding General
326 U.S. 694·Supreme Court of the United States·1945
Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration of this order.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 61,
No. 672.
Misc.
In re Yamashita. Yamashita v. Styer, Commanding General.
December 20, 1945.
[MAJORITY]
Application for leave to file petition for writ of habeas corpus and writ of prohibition; and
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the Philippines.
The Court desires to hear argument upon the questions presented by the motion for leave to file the petition for writs of habeas corpus and prohibition and by the petition for writ of certiorari. Action upon the motion for leave to file and the petition for writ of certiorari will be withheld meanwhile, and the motion and petition are set down for oral argument on Monday, January 7, next.
Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration of this order.