Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Blumenthal et al. v. United States et al., 1963 — 373 U.S. 951 · caselaw · US
General
Blumenthal et al. v. United States et al.
373 U.S. 951·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice'Douglas, and Mr. Justice Brennan are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1026.
Blumenthal et al. v. United States et al.
Victor Rabinowitz and Leonard B. Boudin for petitioners. Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Loev-inger, Lionel Kestenbaum, Max D. Paglin, Daniel R. Ohlbaum and Ruth V. Reel for the United States et al.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice'Douglas, and Mr. Justice Brennan are of the opinion that certiorari should be granted.