Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
UNITED STATES v. ONE CHEVROLET COACH, 1928 โ 25 F.2d 917 ยท caselaw ยท US
General
UNITED STATES v. ONE CHEVROLET COACH
25 F.2d 917ยทUnited States District Court for the District of Oregonยท1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES v. ONE CHEVROLET COACH.
District Court, D. Oregon.
March 6, 1928.
No. 10197.
Customs duties <@=>130(6) โ Automobile In which person carrying opium was riding held not subject to forfeiture (19 USCA ยงยง 482, 483).
Automobile in which person carrying opium was riding at time of its seizure held, not subject to forfeiture, under Rev. St. ยงยง 3061, 3062 (19 USCA ยงยง 482, 483).
Forfeiture Libel. Proceeding by the United States against one Chevrolet coach, engine No. 2671570.
Libel dismissed.
George Neuner, U. S. Atty., Joseph N. Helgerson, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Portland, Or., for the United States.
Roy K. Terry and Richards & Richards, all of Portland, Or., for claimants.
[MAJORITY โ McNARY, District Judge.]
McNARY, District Judge.
This is a libel filed by the United States to forfeit a certain Chevrolet car, under sections 3061 and 3063 of the Revised Statutes (19 USCA ยงยง 482, 483). The case was tried upon an agreed state of facts, namely, that at the time of its seizure the ear was being driven, in Portland, Or., by George Reed, and the remaining occupants were Blanch St. Germain and Jimmy Sun; that Reed had taken the ear from the garage of the owner without the ownerโs knowledge or consent; that while in the car Blanch St. Germain had in her possession three packages of opium, and when the officers ordered the car to stop sho threw the opium into the street.
There is nothing in the record to show that the ear was being used as an instrumentality for the concealment or transportation of the unlicensed drug. The opium was concealed and transported on the person of Blanch St. Germain. I do not think the statute contemplates that the car shall be considered as the offender in cases of this kind. United States v. One Ford Automobile Truck (D. C.) 286 F. 204; United States v. One 1920 Premier Automobile (C. C. A.) 297 F. 1007.
The libel will be dismissed.