Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Reed v. Ingraham, 1799 — 4 U.S. 146 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Reed v. Ingraham
4 U.S. 1464 Dall. 146·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·1799·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Reed v. Ingraham.
Negotiable mstrument.
A contract to receive from J. B., or order, certain stocks, is negotiable.
s. c. 2 Yeates 487, where there is a full report of the case.
[MAJORITY]
On a motion for a new trial, this cause came again before the court (3 Dali. 505), but after argument, the judges cited 4 T. R.; 2 Bl. 1269; and declared, that they wore confirmed, upon mature deliberation, in the opinion, which had been given in charge to the jury, that the action was well brought in the name of the assignee of the stock-contract, promising to receive a transfer from “ J. B. or order.”
Judgment for the plaintiff.