Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Morris PERCANSKY, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, 1924 — 5 F.2d 1020 · caselaw · US
General
Morris PERCANSKY, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES
5 F.2d 1020·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1924
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Morris PERCANSKY, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
December 10, 1924.)
No. 6634.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota.
For opinion below, see 298 F. 991.
Erling Swenson, of Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiff in error.
Lafayette French, Jr., U. S. Atty., of St. Paul, Minn.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Writ of error dismissed, without costs to either party in this court, under rules ,23 and 24.