Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Cavagnaro v. Clark, Attorney General, et al.; and Paulekas v. Clark, Attorney General, et al., 1968 — 393 U.S. 903 · caselaw · US
General
Cavagnaro v. Clark, Attorney General, et al.; and Paulekas v. Clark, Attorney General, et al.
393 U.S. 903·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Stewart would grant the stays.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
October 16, 1968.
No. 889,
No. -. Mise.
Cavagnaro v. Clark, Attorney General, et al.; and Paulekas v. Clark, Attorney General, et al.
Norman Leonard for applicant in each case.
Solicitor General Griswold for respondents in both cases.
[MAJORITY]
Applications for stays, made to Mr. Justice Douglas, were submitted by him to the Court and denied by it.
Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Harlan, and Mr. Justice Stewart would grant the stays.