Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
People ex rel. Frank Schaeffler, Respondent, v. Edward P. Barker et al., Commissioners, etc., Appellants, 1895 — 148 N.Y. 731 · caselaw · US
General
People ex rel. Frank Schaeffler, Respondent, v. Edward P. Barker et al., Commissioners, etc., Appellants
148 N.Y. 731·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
People ex rel. Frank Schaeffler, Respondent, v. Edward P. Barker et al., Commissioners, etc., Appellants.
Reported below, 87 Hun, 194.
(Argued December 9, 1895;
decided December 19, 1895.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made May 17, 1895, which reversed an order of Special Term dismissing a writ of certiorari.
Javid J. Jecm for appellants.
Frank Schaeffler for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.