Contracts · MBE-tested

FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO. v. UNITED STATES et al.

382 U.S. 161·Supreme Court of the United States·1965

Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

FLORIDA EAST COAST RAILWAY CO. v. UNITED STATES et al. No. 541. Decided November 22, 1965. A. Alvis Layne and Fred H. Kent for appellant. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Robert B. Hummel and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States et al.; Prime F. Osborn and Phil C. Beverly for Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.; and William H. Maness for A. Duda & Sons, Inc., et al., appellees. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.