IP
John F. BRENNAN, Appellant, v. Charles C. STEEL and Thomas H. Lynn, Appellees; John F. BRENNAN, Appellant, v. Charles C. STEEL and Thomas H. Lynn, Appellees
2 F.2d 1013·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia·1925
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John F. BRENNAN, Appellant, v. Charles C. STEEL and Thomas H. Lynn, Appellees. John F. BRENNAN, Appellant, v. Charles C. STEEL and Thomas H. Lynn, Appellees.
(Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.
Submitted November 14, 1924.
Decided January 5, 1925.)
Nos. 1688, 1689.
Melville Church, C. L. Sturtevant, E. G. Mason and Herbert H. Porter, all of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
J. H. Milans and O. T. Milans, both of Washington, D. C., for appellees.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
These are appeals from decisions of the First Assistant Commissioner of Patents, affirming decisions of the Board of Examiners in Chief, awarding priority to Steel and Lynn. The invention relates to a tire carrier for automobiles and a design of that carrier. The evidence in these cases lias been very fully reviewed by the Patent Office tribunals, and, having considered it in the light of the briefs and oral argument, we have concluded that Steel and Lynn are entitled to the award of priority. Uor the reasons fully set forth in the opinion of the Assistant C'ommisisoner and of the Board, we affirm the decision in each case. Affirmed.