Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ida Alice Jauncey et al., Respondents, v. Herman G. Weibezahl, Appellant, Impleaded with John Bard et al., Respondents, 1900 — 162 N.Y. 616 · caselaw · US
General
Ida Alice Jauncey et al., Respondents, v. Herman G. Weibezahl, Appellant, Impleaded with John Bard et al., Respondents
162 N.Y. 616·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann and Landon, JJ.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ida Alice Jauncey et al., Respondents, v. Herman G. Weibezahl, Appellant, Impleaded with John Bard et al., Respondents.
Jauncey v. Bard, 45 App. Div. 624, appeal dismissed.
(Argued February 28, 1900;
decided March 20, 1900.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made November 21,1899, affirming an order of Special Term overruling the exceptions of the appellant herein to the report of a referee in an action to foreclose a mortgage, and confirming such report.
David B. Hill for appellant.
Charles L. Jones and Joseph Kling for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
'Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin, Vann and Landon, JJ.