Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Edwin C. Reeves, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant, 1908 — 192 N.Y. 560 · caselaw · US
General
Edwin C. Reeves, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant
192 N.Y. 560·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edwin C. Reeves, Respondent, v. The New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Company, Appellant.
Reeves v. N. Y. C. & H. R. R. R. Co., 114 App. Div. 907, affirmed.
(Argued April 23, 1908;
decided May 19, 1908.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered June 11, 1906, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term in an action to obtain the restoration of a crossing under the tracks of defendant’s railroad and for damages resulting from its discontinuance.
Edward Harris, Jr., for appellant.
H. R. Durfee for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.