General
Thomas Little, Respondent, v. The Kingston City Railroad Company, Appellant
158 N.Y. 738·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
All concur, except O’Brien, and Vann, JJ., dissenting, and Parker, Oh. J., not sitting.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas Little, Respondent, v. The Kingston City Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued March 22, 1899;
decided April 18, 1899.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered November 14, 1896, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Little v. Kingston City R. R. Co., 9 App. Div. 623, affirmed.
Amos Van Etten for appellant.
Alvah S. Newcomb for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except O’Brien, and Vann, JJ., dissenting, and Parker, Oh. J., not sitting.