Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Aetna Insurance Co. v. Illinois Central R. Co., 1937 — 302 U.S. 652 · caselaw · US
General
Aetna Insurance Co. v. Illinois Central R. Co.
302 U.S. 652·Supreme Court of the United States·1937
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 40.
Aetna Insurance Co. v. Illinois Central R. Co.
Argued November 18, 1937.
Decided November 22, 1937.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Certiorari, 301 U. S. 679, to the Supreme Court of Illinois.
Per Curiam:
After hearing argument the Court is of the opinion that the decision of the state court rests upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Hen derson. Bridge Co. v. Henderson City, 141 U. S. 679, 688; Enterprise Irrig. District v. Canal Co., 243 U. S. 157, 164; McCoy v. Shaw, 277 U. S. 302, 303; Fox Film Corp. v. Muller, 296 U. S. 207, 210. The writ of certiorari is dismissed.
Mr. Melvin L. Griffith, with whom Mr. George M. Stevens was on the brief, for petitioner. Messrs. John W. Freels, Edward C. Craig, and Charles A. Helsell were on the brief for respondent.