Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
HORNBEAK v. HAMM, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE FOR ALABAMA, 1968 — 393 U.S. 9 · caselaw · US
General
HORNBEAK v. HAMM, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE FOR ALABAMA
393 U.S. 9·Supreme Court of the United States·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HORNBEAK v. HAMM, COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE FOR ALABAMA.
No. 260.
Decided October 14, 1968.
Barry Hess for appellant.
MacDonald Gallion, Attorney General of Alabama, and Willard W. Livingston and Herbert I. Burson, Assistant Attorneys General, for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to affirm is granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Hárlan, and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted and the case set for argument.