Torts · MBE-tested
John L. Kelley, Respondent, v. New York State Railways, Appellant
145 A.D. 902·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1911·NY
All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that the defendant was not shown guilty of actionable negligence and that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John L. Kelley, Respondent, v. New York State Railways, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs.
All concurred, except McLennan, P. J., who dissented upon the ground that the defendant was not shown guilty of actionable negligence and that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as matter of law.