Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Louisiana, 337 U. S. 902, 1949 — 337 U.S. 928 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
United States v. Louisiana, 337 U. S. 902
337 U.S. 928·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or disposition of the petition for rehearing.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 13, Original.
United States v. Louisiana, 337 U. S. 902.
Bolivar E. Kemp, Jr., Attorney General of Louisiana, John L. Madden, Assistant Attorney General, L. H. Perez and F. Trowbridge vom Baur for defendant.
[MAJORITY]
The petition for rehearing is denied. The objections to the granting of leave to file the complaint are overruled and the State of Louisiana is directed to answer the allegations of the complaint within the time specified in the subpoena, otherwise the plaintiff may proceed ex parte. Rule 6, par. 2 and 3.
Mr. Justice Jackson took no part in the consideration or disposition of the petition for rehearing.