Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Sarah E. Baucus, Appellant, v. James Barr et al., Respondents, 1887 — 107 N.Y. 624 · caselaw · US
General
Sarah E. Baucus, Appellant, v. James Barr et al., Respondents
107 N.Y. 624·New York Court of Appeals·1887·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sarah E. Baucus, Appellant, v. James Barr et al., Respondents.
(Argued June 20, 1887;
decided October 11, 1887.)
Robert H. McOlellanv for appellant.
A. D. Wait for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinions of General and Special Terms.
All concur except Earl, J., dissenting; Ruger, Cít. J., not sitting, and Andrews, J., not voting.
Judgment affirmed.