Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Paul RESUAM, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, 1933 — 67 F.2d 850 · caselaw · US
General
Paul RESUAM, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee
67 F.2d 850·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Paul RESUAM, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 7114.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 14, 1933.
E. H. Kohlhase, of Kelso, Wash., for appellant.
Anthony Savage, U. S. Atty., of Seattle, Wash., and Joseph A. Mallery, Asst.'U. S. Atty., of Tacoma, Wash.
Before WILBUR, GARRECHT, and MACK, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — WILBUR, Circuit Judge.]
WILBUR, Circuit Judge.
On authority of decision in James Green v. United States (C. C. A.) 67 F.(2d) 846, to-day filed, judgment in this ease is reversed, with instructions to dismiss.