Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frederick Holthausen et al., Respondents, v. William E. Kells et al., as Executors of Thomas Kells, Deceased, Appellants, 1898 — 154 N.Y. 776 · caselaw · US
General
Frederick Holthausen et al., Respondents, v. William E. Kells et al., as Executors of Thomas Kells, Deceased, Appellants
154 N.Y. 776·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frederick Holthausen et al., Respondents, v. William E. Kells et al., as Executors of Thomas Kells, Deceased, Appellants.
Holthausen v. Kells, 18 App. Div. 80, affirmed.
(Submitted December 6, 1897;
decided January 11, 1898.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered May 18, 1897, upon an order which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a decision of the Kings County Court.
Henry Cooper for appellants.
Daniel Cameron for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
All concur.