Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Richard Deeves, Appellant, v. The Metropolitan Realty Company of the City of New York, Respondent, 1894 — 141 N.Y. 587 · caselaw · US
General
Richard Deeves, Appellant, v. The Metropolitan Realty Company of the City of New York, Respondent
141 N.Y. 587·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Richard Deeves, Appellant, v. The Metropolitan Realty Company of the City of New York, Respondent.
(Argued January 29, 1894;
decided February 27, 1894.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas for the city and county of Yew York, made December 4, 1893, which reversed an order of Special Term denying a motion by defendant that certain issues of fact arising on counterclaims set up in the answer be settled for trial by jury and directed said issues to be stated.
David Thornton for appellant.
Cha/rles J. LLard/y for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Order affirmed.