Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William Weidman, Appellant, v. The City of New York, Respondent, 1903 — 176 N.Y. 586 · caselaw · US
Corporations
William Weidman, Appellant, v. The City of New York, Respondent
176 N.Y. 586·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William Weidman, Appellant, v. The City of New York, Respondent.
Weidman v. City of New York, 84 App. Div. 321, affirmed.
(Argued October 22, 1903;
decided November 10, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 23, 1903, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term.
W. M. Posebault for appellant.
George L. Lives, Corporation Counsel (Theodore Cormoly of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ;.no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Cray, Haight, Martin, .Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.