Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lewis R. Stegman, as Late Sheriff of Kings County, Respondent, v. Henry S. Hollingsworth, Appellant, 1898 — 154 N.Y. 784 · caselaw · US
General
Lewis R. Stegman, as Late Sheriff of Kings County, Respondent, v. Henry S. Hollingsworth, Appellant
154 N.Y. 784·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Lewis R. Stegman, as Late Sheriff of Kings County, Respondent, v. Henry S. Hollingsworth, Appellant.
Stegman v. Hollingsworth, 6 App. Div. 609, affirmed.
(Argued December 16, 1897;
decided January 11, 1898.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered July 1, 1896, upon an order affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict.
Fernando Solinger for appellant.
George Lawyer for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.