Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Nate MARSHALL, Appellant, v. A. C. ADERHOLD, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia, Appellee, 1935 — 75 F.2d 1016 · caselaw · US
General
Nate MARSHALL, Appellant, v. A. C. ADERHOLD, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia, Appellee
75 F.2d 1016·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1935
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nate MARSHALL, Appellant, v. A. C. ADERHOLD, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Atlanta, Georgia, Appellee.
No. 7631.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
March 9, 1935.
Nate Marshall, in pro. per.
Lawrence S. Camp, U. S. Atty., Harvey H. Tisinger, Asst. U. S. Atty., and H. T. Nichols, Sp. Atty., all of Atlanta, Ga., for appellee.
Before BRYAN, SIBLEY, and WALKER, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On the authority of United States ex rel. Cheramie v. Dutton, 74 F.(2d) 740 (C. C. A. 5), decided January 10, 1935, the, judgment is affirmed.