Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of George W. McLean as Receiver of Taxes, Respondent, v. The Couper Milling Company, Appellant, 1892 — 133 N.Y. 603 · caselaw · US
Tax
In the Matter of the Application of George W. McLean as Receiver of Taxes, Respondent, v. The Couper Milling Company, Appellant
133 N.Y. 603·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of George W. McLean as Receiver of Taxes, Respondent, v. The Couper Milling Company, Appellant.
(Argued April 14, 1892;
decided May 3, 1892.)
Appeal from order of the General Term, of the Supreme; Court in the first judicial department, made May 13, 1891,, which affirmed an order of Special Term directing payment" of a fine because of defendant’s refusal to pay a personal tax»
Sutherland Tennexj for appellant.
John G. II. Meyers for respondent..
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm ; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.