General

Conservation Commission of the Town of Newtown v. Milivoje Kovac

33 Conn. App. 938·Connecticut Appellate Court·1994·CT

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Conservation Commission of the Town of Newtown v. Milivoje Kovac (10883) Dupont, C. J., Foti and Heiman, Js. Argued January 18 decision released February 15, 1994 Sigmund L. Miller, for the appellant (defendant). Joseph G. Walsh, for the appellee (plaintiff). [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. We have fully reviewed the record and briefs and considered the oral arguments of the parties. The appeal largely rests on fact bound issues. The trial court’s findings are supported by the evidence and the inferences that may reasonably be drawn therefrom. Having applied the appropriate standard of review, we conclude that the trial court’s findings are not clearly erroneous, that it did not abuse its discretion and that its decision conforms to the applicable law. The judgment is affirmed.