Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James Lawlor, Respondent, v. Magnolia Metal Company, Appellant, 1896 — 149 N.Y. 591 · caselaw · US
General
James Lawlor, Respondent, v. Magnolia Metal Company, Appellant
149 N.Y. 591·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James Lawlor, Respondent, v. Magnolia Metal Company, Appellant.
Reported below, 2 App. Div. 552.
(Submitted April 23, 1896;
decided May 26, 1896.)
Appeal from order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made March" 20, 1896, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion by defendant to require plaintiff to pay sheriff’s fees upon an attachment and to direct the sheriff to deliver to the defendant its property then in his possession by virtue thereof.
Alexander S. Bacon for appellant.
L. A. Gould and Constant & Coghill for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur.