Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
MARYLAND CASUALTY CO. v. RONAN et al., 1930 — 37 F.2d 449 · caselaw · US
General
MARYLAND CASUALTY CO. v. RONAN et al.
37 F.2d 449·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MARYLAND CASUALTY CO. v. RONAN et al.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
January 6, 1930.
No. 156.
David E. Porter, Harry W. Witters, and Jutten A. Longmoore, all of St. Johnsbury, Vt., for appellant.
Searles, Graves & Waterman, of St. Johnsbury, Vt., for appellee.
Before L. HAND, SWAN, and MACK, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed on opinion below.