General
A. F. ROSSLOW, Petitioner, v. H. I. MULCREVY, County Clerk, etc., Respondent
136 Cal. App. 787·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1934·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Civ. No. 9358.
First Appellate District, Division One.
January 29, 1934.]
A. F. ROSSLOW, Petitioner, v. H. I. MULCREVY, County Clerk, etc., Respondent.
H. C. Burnhill and Francis Gill for Petitioner.
Frank V. Kington for Respondent.
[MAJORITY — TYLER, P. J.]
TYLER, P. J.
Petition for mandate to compel respondent to issue execution on a judgment.
The facts are stated in the opinion in Rosslow v. Janssen, ante, p. 467 [29 Pac. (2d) 287], this day decided. Upon the authority of that case the petition is denied.
Knight, J., and Cashin, J., concurred.
A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on February 28, 1934.