Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
GALLAWAY v. FORT WORTH BANK, 1902 — 186 U.S. 177 · caselaw · US
Securities
GALLAWAY v. FORT WORTH BANK
186 U.S. 17746 L. Ed. 1111·Supreme Court of the United States·1902
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GALLAWAY v. FORT WORTH BANK.
MOTION TO SUE OUT WRIT OF ERROR; WITHOUT GIVING BOND REQUIRED BY LAW.
Submitted May 19, 1902.
Decided June 2, 1902.
The act of Congress of July 20, 1892, 27 Stat. 252, has no application to proceedings in this court.
The case is stated in the opinion.
Mr. A. Gállaway vo. propria persona.
No appearance opposing.
[MAJORITY — The Chief Justice.]
The Chief Justice.
This is an application for leave to prosecute a writ of erroi; to a state court, without giving security
as required by section 1000 of the Revised Statutes, under an act of Congress of July 20,. 1892. 27 Stat. 252.
. The motion must be denied. Our ruling has uniformly been, and has been enforced in repeated instances that that act has no application to proceedings in this court.
Motion denied.