Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Nancy H. Williams, Respondent, v. George W. G. Kinney et al., Appellants, 1890 — 118 N.Y. 679 · caselaw · US
General
Nancy H. Williams, Respondent, v. George W. G. Kinney et al., Appellants
118 N.Y. 679·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Nancy H. Williams, Respondent, v. George W. G. Kinney et al., Appellants.
(Argued January 13, 1890;
decided January 31, 1890.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered upon an order made January 21, 1887, which affirmed a judgment in iavoi of plaintiff, entered upon the report of a referee.
James P. Olney for appellants.
C. W. White for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur except Follett, Ch. J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.