General
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, et al., Appellants, v. PHŒNIX SAVINGS BANK & TRUST CO., Appellee; SAME v. PHŒNIX NATIONAL BANK; SAME v. VALLEY BANK & TRUST CO.; SAME v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF ARIZONA AT PHŒNIX; SAME v. TEMPE NATIONAL BANK; PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA, et al. v. SOUTHERN ARIZONA BANK & TRUST CO.
72 F.2d 1016·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1934
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
MARICOPA COUNTY, ARIZONA, et al., Appellants, v. PHŒNIX SAVINGS BANK & TRUST CO., Appellee. SAME v. PHŒNIX NATIONAL BANK. SAME v. VALLEY BANK & TRUST CO. SAME v. FIRST NAT. BANK OF ARIZONA AT PHŒNIX. SAME v. TEMPE NATIONAL BANK. PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA, et al. v. SOUTHERN ARIZONA BANK & TRUST CO.
Nos. 7367-7372.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 8, 1934.
Arthur T. La Prade, Atty. Gen., and Charles L. Strouss, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellants.
Chalmers, Fennemore & Nairn, of Phosnix, Ariz., for appellees Phoenix Sav. Bank & Trust Co. and Phoenix Nat. Bank.
Armstrong, Bjramer, Morrison & Roche, of Phoenix, Ariz., for appellee First Nat. Bank of Arizona.
Kibbey, Bennett, Gust, Smith & Rosenfeld and Charles L. Rawlins, all of Phoenix, Ariz., for appellee Valley Bank & Trust Co.
Charles Woolf, of Phoenix, Ariz., for appellee Tempe Nat. Bank.
Darnell & Nave and James R. Dunseath, all of Tucson, Ariz., for appellee Southern Arizona Bank & Trust Co.
Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and GARRECHT, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon stipulation of counsel for respective parties in each of above causes, ordered appeal dismissed in each cause; mandates forthwith.