General
William L. Porter, Appellant, v. Uri Rhoades, as Executor of Harvey Tinkham, Deceased, Respondent
170 N.Y. 583·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William L. Porter, Appellant, v. Uri Rhoades, as Executor of Harvey Tinkham, Deceased, Respondent.
Porter v. Rhoades, 48 App. Div. 635, appeal dismissed.
(Argued February 20, 1902;
decided March 7, 1902.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered April 6, 1900, reversing a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee and granting a new trial.
Edwin H. Risley and Charles A. Fuller for appellant.
Henry R. Coman and F. W. Cushman for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal dismissed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, C’Brien, Bartlett, Haight and Martin, JJ. Not voting : Vann, J.