General
William F. Drake, by Doris M. Drake, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Mae V. Marks et al., Appellants; Doris M. Drake, Respondent, v. Mae V. Marks et al., Appellants
22 A.D.2d 988·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1964·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William F. Drake, by Doris M. Drake, His Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Mae V. Marks et al., Appellants. Doris M. Drake, Respondent, v. Mae V. Marks et al., Appellants.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Upon all the facts, and under the circumstances demonstrated, we find no compelling reason to disturb Special Term’s exercise of discretion in changing the place of trial to Broome County, upon the new motion permitted by our prior decision (20 A D 2d 614). Order affirmed, with $75 costs. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Reynolds, Aulisi and Hamm, JJ., concur.