Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. W. E. Vasbinder, 1918 — 245 U.S. 635 · caselaw · US
General
Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. W. E. Vasbinder
245 U.S. 635·Supreme Court of the United States·1918
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 112.
Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. W. E. Vasbinder.
In error to the Court of Civil Appeals, Fourth Supreme Judicial District, State of Texas.
Argued January 2, 1918.
Decided January 7, 1918.
Mr. Alexander Britton, Mr. J. W. Terry, Mr. Gardiner Lathrop, Mr. A. H. Culwell, Mr. 'Evans Browne and Mr. F. W. Clements for plaintiff in error.
Mr. R. H. Ward for defendant in error, submitted.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment reversed with costs upon the authority of Adams Express Co. v. Croninger, 226 U. S. 491; Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. Robinson, 233 U. S. 173; St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Ry. Co. v. Starbird, 243 U. S. 592; American Express Co. v. United States Horse Shoe Co., 244 U. S. 58.