General
Samuel W. Scott et al. v. Ida B. W. Booth
253 U.S. 475·Supreme Court of the United States·1920
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 256.
Samuel W. Scott et al. v. Ida B. W. Booth.
Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri,.
Argued April 26, 27, 1920.
Decided May 17, 1920.
Mr. H. M. Langworthy and Mr. Jackson H. Balston, with whom Mr. Bruce Barnett, Mr. O. H. Dean, Mr. Stanley D. Willis, Mr. R. B. Thomson and Mr. J. T. Montgomery were on the brief, for plaintiffs in error. Mr. C. W.Prince, with whom Mr. A. E. Crane was on the brief, for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for-want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U.S. 173, 175; Louisiana Navigation Co. v. Oyster Commission of Louisiana, 226 U. S. 99,101; Grays Harbor Co. v. Coats-Fordney Co., 243 U. S. 251, 255; Bruce v. Tobin, 245 U. S. 18, 19.