Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Alter Kushes, Appellant, v. Isidore Ginsberg, Respondent, 1907 — 188 N.Y. 630 · caselaw · US
Torts · MBE-tested
Alter Kushes, Appellant, v. Isidore Ginsberg, Respondent
188 N.Y. 630·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Alter Kushes, Appellant, v. Isidore Ginsberg, Respondent.
(Argued May 3, 1907;
decided May 21, 1907.)
Kushes v. Ginsberg, 99 App. Div. 417, affirmed. /
Appeal from a judgment entered July 13, 1905, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term sustaining a demurrer to the complaint in an action by a husband to recover for the loss of services of his wife through personal injuries alleged to have been occasioned by defendant’s negligence.
Benjamin Tuslca for appellant.
Garl Sdhurz Petraseh and Henry 8. Mansfield foi respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Cli. J., Gray, O’Brien, Yann,Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.