Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Railway Express Agency, Inc., v. Railroad Retirement Board et al., 1958 — 356 U.S. 967 · caselaw · US
Administrative
Railway Express Agency, Inc., v. Railroad Retirement Board et al.
356 U.S. 967·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 908.
Railway Express Agency, Inc., v. Railroad Retirement Board et al.
Robert J. Fletcher and Francis M. Shea for petitioner.
Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Doub, Morton Hollander, Lionel Kestenbaum, Myles F. Gibbons and Edward E. Reilly for the Railroad Retirement Board, and Lester P. Schoene for the Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employes et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 7th Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.