IP
In the Matter of the Application of Margaret N. HERNANDEZ, Administratrix of the Estate of Arturo Hernandez-Mejia
298 F. 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia·1924
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of Margaret N. HERNANDEZ, Administratrix of the Estate of Arturo Hernandez-Mejia.
(Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.
Submitted May 14, 1924.
Decided June 2, 1924.)
Patent Appeal No. 1663.
Benjamin Roman, of New York City, for appellant.
Theodore A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C., for Commissioner of Patents.
Before ROBB and VAN. ORSDED, Associate Justices, and SMITH, Judge of the United States Court of Customs Appeals.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal from concurrent decisions of the Patent Office
tribunals refusing to allow this reissue' application with broader claims, it having been filed almost three years after the issuance of the original patent. The Patent Office tribunals have carefully considered the facts and have found that no special circumstances have been shown to excuse the delay. We concur in this finding. See In re Starkey, 21 App. D. C. 519, In re Ams, 29 App. D. C. 91, and In re Otto, 259 Fed. 985, 49 App. D. C. 89. The decision is affirmed. Affirmed.