Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
EISUKE TAKANA, alias Eizo Kono, Appellant, v. Edward L. HAFF, Acting Com'r of Immigration, Port of San Francisco, Cal., Appellee; LOW SING TUNG, Appellant, v. Edward L. HAFF, Acting Com'r of Immigration, Port of San Francisco, Cal., Appellee, 1933 — 63 F.2d 1001 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
EISUKE TAKANA, alias Eizo Kono, Appellant, v. Edward L. HAFF, Acting Com'r of Immigration, Port of San Francisco, Cal., Appellee; LOW SING TUNG, Appellant, v. Edward L. HAFF, Acting Com'r of Immigration, Port of San Francisco, Cal., Appellee
63 F.2d 1001·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
EISUKE TAKANA, alias Eizo Kono, Appellant, v. Edward L. HAFF, Acting Com’r of Immigration, Port of San Francisco, Cal., Appellee. LOW SING TUNG, Appellant, v. Edward L. HAFF, Acting Com’r of Immigration, Port of San Francisco, Cal., Appellee.
Nos. 6820, 6905.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 20, 1933.
Stephen M. White, of San Prancisco, Cal., for appellants.
I. M. Peckham, U. S. Atty., and Robert B. McMillan, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of stipulation of counsel in each of above causes for dismissal of appeal, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that the appeal in each of above causes be, and hereby is dismissed.