Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ackerson v. United States, 1975 — 419 U.S. 1099 · caselaw · US
General
Ackerson v. United States
419 U.S. 1099·Supreme Court of the United States·1975
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice White, and Mr. Justice Rehnquist dissent.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 74-5352.
Ackerson v. United States.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 8th Cir. Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and certiorari granted. Upon representation of the Solicitor General set forth in his brief for the United States filed December 19, 1974, judgment vacated and case remanded to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri to permit the Government to dismiss the charges against petitioner.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice White, and Mr. Justice Rehnquist dissent.