General
Kevin McKENZIE a/k/a Keith Barrett v. STATE of Arkansas
356 Ark. 122146 S.W.3d 892·Arkansas Supreme Court·2004·AR
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Kevin McKENZIE a/k/a Keith Barrett v. STATE of Arkansas
CR 03-775
146 S.W.3d 892
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Opinion delivered February 12, 2004
Charles E. Waldman, for appellant.
No response.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The procedural background of this matter is set out in McKenzie v. State, 355 Ark. 259, 134 S.W.3d. 5 (2003) (per curiam). Mr. Charles E. Waldman appeared before this court on January 15, 2004, to show cause why he should not be held in civil contempt for failing to comply with the terms of our previous per curiam orders. Mr. Waldman, represented by Mr. JefFRosenzweig, denied that he should be held in contempt for noncompliance with our orders.
Given the circumstances of this case, we hereby appoint a special master, The Honorable John Cole, to conduct a hearing on the matter. Upon receipt of the master’s findings, we will render a decision on the matter.