Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
American Fruit Product Company, Appellant, v. John G. Ward, Respondent, 1908 — 192 N.Y. 549 · caselaw · US
General
American Fruit Product Company, Appellant, v. John G. Ward, Respondent
192 N.Y. 549·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
American Fruit Product Company, Appellant, v. John G. Ward, Respondent.
(Submitted April 20, 1908;
decided April 24, 1908.)
[MAJORITY]
Motion for re-argument granted and re-argument to be had on a day agreed upon by the parties, or in default of agreement time to be fixed by the chief judge. (See 190 N. Y. 533.)