Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Richard Oakley, Appellant, v. Abram Healey, Respondent, 1888 — 108 N.Y. 664 · caselaw · US
General
Richard Oakley, Appellant, v. Abram Healey, Respondent
108 N.Y. 664·New York Court of Appeals·1888·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Richard Oakley, Appellant, v. Abram Healey, Respondent.
(Argued February 9, 1888;
decided February 28, 1888.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made December 2, 1885, denying a new trial and ordering judgment to be entered for defendant upon the verdict rendered under the direction of the court.
3. B. Lligimbotam for appellant.
T. F. Bush for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Peckham, J., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.