General
Michael Wild et al., Respondents, v. Bausch & Lome Incorporated, Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, et al., Defendant. Cohen's Fashion Optical, Inc., Third-Party Defendant
250 A.D.2d 382672 N.Y.S.2d 687·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1998·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Michael Wild et al., Respondents, v Bausch & Lome Incorporated, Appellant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, et al., Defendant. Cohen’s Fashion Optical, Inc., Third-Party Defendant.
[672 NYS2d 687]
[MAJORITY]
—Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Stuart Cohen, J.), entered on or about November 7, 1997, which order, inter alia, only conditionally granted appellant’s motion for an order striking plaintiffs’ note of issue, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as moot.
A 1998 order in this action striking plaintiffs’ case from the TAP calendar renders the appeal moot (see, e.g., Westinghouse Elec. Supply Co. v Pyramid Champlain Co., 193 AD2d 928, 932). Were the appeal not moot, we would find no improvident exercise of discretion. Concur — Milonas, J. P., Williams, Tom, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.