Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
DENVER MUD CHEMICAL CO., Appellant, v. GERMICIDE COMPANY, 1924 — 2 F.2d 1015 · caselaw · US
General
DENVER MUD CHEMICAL CO., Appellant, v. GERMICIDE COMPANY
2 F.2d 1015·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1924
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
DENVER MUD CHEMICAL CO., Appellant, v. GERMICIDE COMPANY.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
June 16, 1924.)
No. 6599.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Missouri.
Pierre R. Porter, of Kansas City, Mo., for appellant.
Robert Stone, of Topeka, Kan., E. H. Gamble, of Kansas City, Mo., and Eugene S. Quinton, and Beryl R. Johnson, both of Topeka, Kan., for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Order of continuance vacated and set aside, and appeal dismissed, with costs, on motion of appellee.