Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George Chamberlin et al., Appellants, v. George Van Campen et al., Respondents, 1890 — 120 N.Y. 637 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
George Chamberlin et al., Appellants, v. George Van Campen et al., Respondents
120 N.Y. 637·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George Chamberlin et al., Appellants, v. George Van Campen et al., Respondents.
(Argued March 13, 1890;
decided April 15, 1890.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, made February 11, 1890, which reversed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and granted a new trial.
This action was brought to recover damages for an alleged breach of warranty on sale of certain machinery. Defendants claimed the warranty, and claimed the contract was reduced to writing. The ‘writing was in the form of a bill of sale, signed by defendants. Plaintiffs claimed that the contract was entirely oral. The court here held that the question was, under the evidence, one of fact for the jury, and was properly submitted to them.
J. II. Waring for appellants.
O. S. Ca/ry for respondents.
[MAJORITY — Parker, J.,]
Parker, J.,
reads for reversal of order of General Term, and for affirmance of judgment.
All concur except Bradley and Haight, JJ., not sitting.
Order reversed and judgment affirmed.