General
Morris Friedman v. United States; Morris Friedman v. United States; Morris Friedman v. United States; Camden Basket Co. et al. v. United States; Morris Friedman & Co. et al. v. United States
61 Cust. Ct. 662·United States Customs Court·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. P68/467.
protests 313448-K, etc. (Philadelphia).
No. P68/468.
protests 316993-K, etc. (Philadelphia).
No. P68/469.
protests 321762-K, etc. (Philadelphia).
No. P68/470.
protests 59/27136, etc. (Philadelphia).
No. P68/471.
protests 64/8027, etc. (Philadelphia).
Morris Friedman v. United States, Morris Friedman v. United States, Morris Friedman v. United States, Camden Basket Co. et al. v. United States, Morris Friedman & Co. et al. v. United States,
[MAJORITY — Watson, J.]
Watson, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of bulrush, corn husk, or maize baskets similar in all material respects to those the subject of Carson M. Simon & Co. v. United States (55 Cust. Ct. 103, C.D. 2558) and Morris Friedman v. United States (58 Cust. Ct. 456, C.D. 3019), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.