General

United States v. Borden Company et al.

368 U.S. 963·Supreme Court of the United States·1962

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

January 15, 1962. No. 439. United States v. Borden Company et al. Stuart S. Ball for the Borden Company, and L. Edward Hart and John Paul Stevens for the Bowman Dairy Company, movants. [MAJORITY] Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. (Probable jurisdiction noted, ante, p. 924.) The motions of the Borden Company and the Bowman Dairy Company that separate records be printed are denied. In so far as the motions request the filing of separate briefs and separate hearings on the merits, the motions are granted. Reported below:-F. Supp.-.